Rethinking ABM in the Age of Generative AI: Why Both Approaches Matter
- Nick Davala
- Aug 6
- 2 min read
A recent BrandEquity.com article sparked an interesting debate: Is the rise of Generative AI signaling the end of traditional, customized Account-Based Marketing (ABM) in B2B organizations? The suggestion that AI-driven “hyper-customization” could replace human-led ABM is certainly provocative. But is it accurate? In short: not in my opinion. Both approaches have distinct strengths and play vital roles in effective demand generation.
Traditional ABM: The Power of Human Insight
Traditional ABM is rooted in a human-first approach. It focuses on a select group of high-value accounts, with marketing and sales teams working closely to build deep, tailored strategies. This method relies on a deep and holistic understanding of each client’s unique needs, organizational structure, and buying dynamics. The result is highly personalized engagement, built on trust and strategic partnership. The true value of traditional ABM lies in its ability to foster meaningful, long-term relationships that drive business growth.
Generative AI: Hyper-Customization at Scale
Generative AI, on the other hand, enables organizations to personalize outreach at unprecedented scale. By analyzing massive datasets and uncovering hidden patterns, AI can deliver tailored messages to thousands—or even millions—of prospects. While it still requires human oversight and strategic direction, Generative AI excels at automating and accelerating the personalization process. Its strengths are efficiency, predictive accuracy, and the capacity to engage a broad audience with individualized content.

A Hybrid Approach: The Best of Both Worlds
At Higgins Beach Marketing, we see the greatest success by blending these strategies. We use AI-enhanced tools for broad demand generation and cold prospecting, casting a wide net to build awareness and attract leads. From there, we identify high-potential accounts and apply traditional ABM tactics to nurture those relationships with the depth and attention they deserve.
Conclusion